They shoot deer.
Wait, something shoots people? What is it then? Oh, yeah, people shoot people. With what, I wonder. Knives? Baseball bats? Baseballs?
I, like many, waited for the other shoe to drop. It never did. After the shootings at Virginia Tech, I waited for someone to ask why someone with a psychiatric history, or without one for that matter, should be able to buy the firepower to protect a fortress, without a waiting period. Or with one.
Why? because a few testosterone-sodden folks feel that if you can't kill a hundred deer in 3 minutes, your rights are being infringed. Never mind the rights of the victims who fall prey in increasing numbers to nuts out for "revenge."
Yes. It's your second amendment right. Written back in a time when a gun was necessary to put meat on the table, a tool without which you and your family would likely starve. Taking it away then would have been like taking away your right to go to the grocery store now. It was probably included as an amendment to the bill of rights so that the people could form a militia to protect the U.S. from outside attack. No such call now.
And for protection too. Back then, you loaded your shot and powder into a gun and tamped it down before you could get off a shot. Still, you needed it to protect yourself against villains. Or Indians. Maybe pirates.
Now the population has become the prey. To protect the interest of a few for whom bigger and more is always better (think about putting your decision-making about this in the hands of Tim "the Toolman" Taylor). The truth is, most of the people are not similarly armed. That's why one man with guns can take out 31 victims.
So yes. People kill people. People with guns really kill people. A madman with a knife or any other weapon can kill maybe one or two before someone neutralizes him. If he's frenzied, he may slaughter more. But it pales in comparison with the number of people he can kill with sophisticated firepower.
Cho was able to get his Walther P22 and his Glock 19 with little trouble. These semiautomatic pistols release one round for every pull of the trigger. Given a large enough magazine, that type of efficiency can do a lot of damage. So granted, they are not the most efficient you can get. He could arguably have done more damage with an assault rifle, though it would have been harder to conceal, or a fully automatic weapon, either of which would have been legal.
Why is this allowed here when the rest of the civilized world got rid of guns long ago? One reason is political lobbying. So much money goes to politicians from the NRA that they don't dare cross them. And many conservative states want to keep their guns. Fine. Let them keep their historical replicas, their target shooting guns, their revolvers. Someone has chosen to interpret all this as that these people want individuals to own semiautomatic rifles. Maybe theyr'e not really that stupid.
The strident arguments in favor of NO gun control are being brought to you by the same individuals who masterminded the Iraq War, and are chipping away at your civil rights. They may be shrill and strident.
Do you really think that makes them right?
Now I hear that if the student population had been allowed to carry guns on campus, someone would have taken out Cho before he could have done all that damage. Does anyone think that escalating this and increasing gun access is the answer? If guns were banned tomorrow, it would take decades to get the ones that are out there off the streets, but it would be a start toward sanity.
Arming more individuals to protect against the occasional madman is mad in itself. The statistics show that a homeowner pulling a gun against an invader is as likely to have it taken away from him and used against him as he is to foil a crime. And privately owned guns are more likely to be used against a family member in an accidental firing or in anger than against a home invader.
It's time to stop the madness.
Yeah. It's people who kill people. People with guns. It takes two to tango. No people, no killings. No guns, no killings. What do you suppose is the answer here?
Addendum 5/11/07. Captain makes a good point. I forgot to credit the source of the photo, something I am usually meticulous about doing. It's from Team Glock.
Recent Comments